12 ms·
That's valid feedback. There is no clock, but there maybe should be. In this case, yes, Jeff and I had to PUSH. And that's a hassle. I'll ask around.
by shanselman 2y ago
That's valid feedback. There is no clock, but there maybe should be. In this case, yes, Jeff and I had to PUSH. And that's a hassle. I'll ask around.
- _mlbt 2y agoI appreciate your hard work on open sourcing this! If you’re taking requests I’d love to see MS-DOS 5.0 or at least QBasic next.
- shanselman 2y agoYep, I need to get 3.3 and then do 5, 6
- atlas_hugged 2y agoLegend. Keep being the Bob Ross of IT. Love what you do. Thank you.
- justin66 2y agoIronically those words capture how those of us who bought a computer with DOS 4.00 felt about it. :D But this is really great.
- raverbashing 2y agoTrue, I don't know when Qbasic (and Edit?) went into dos (according to Wikipedia they were on 5.0)
- _mlbt 2y agoDOS 5 was when I really got into computers. I spent hours pouring through the included manual learning all the shell commands and learning how to write .BAT files. Then I discovered QBasic and it changed everything.
- macdice 2y agoThis is fantastic work, thanks. Hmm, what else... let's see... Xenix also really, really wants to be free! What a magnificent piece of forgotten computer history it is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix
- justin66 2y agoThat actually would be pretty wild.
- davidferguson 2y agoIt's fantastic work you've done. As someone who works at a older software company (founded early 80s), I'm sad that there isn't a push internally for us to make our old software source available, or even just the binaries available! What sort of tactics did you use to convince them? Maybe I can apply them to where I work too...
- HeckFeck 2y agoWindows 95 OSR5 - Open Source Release. Someday soon?