5 ms·

Windows 2000 was part of the professional NT line, though, and was the companion of Me for the millennium releases. As far as I know, 2000 wasn't marketed to ho

Windows 2000 was part of the professional NT line, though, and was the companion of Me for the millennium releases. As far as I know, 2000 wasn't marketed to home users. I think what the comment you replied to is saying is the the transition away from DOS wasn't completed for both professional and home markets until XP, which unified everything under NT for all markets.

skeeter2020 2y ago
this is accurate; the 2000 line targeted business, and if you remember having a consumer computer with 2000 pro it didn't support a lot of hardware.
- freedomben 2y ago
  Can confirm. I upgraded my 98 box to 2000 and never did get some of my hardware working. When I told people I was using 2000 everybody assumed I had stolen it from work. I didn't. My friend stole it from work and shared it with me ;-)
  - lproven 2y ago
    A license key of 11111-1111111 worked, if I remember correctly. :-)
- 486sx33 2y ago
  Nice part of that pain came when XP was released. Win 2000 drivers mostly all happily loaded into Win XP !
voidfunc 2y ago
Drivers were kinda a mess from what I remember in 2000 especially on the graphics card side of things. The HW vendors needed more time to switch over.
stevetron 2y ago
Around the year 2000, I was studying computer science at a university. Most of their PC's ran on Windows 3.1. I was using it at home. But one day, Microsoft sent me an offer: I could purchase the student release of Windows 2000 workstation for a mere $25.00. I went for it, and found it better than the Windows NT nap-sayers at school said. I don't know why I was contacted. Probbably because of other Microsoft programs I'd bought at the student bookstore.
- tracker1 2y ago
  Windows 2000 was a pretty great OS. Used to enjoy using a Litestep shell instead of explorer. While it wasn't great for a lot of games, many did run fine. I liked it a lot better than OS/2 that I ran previously. I generally ran 2-4x the amount of RAM as most did. Still do. Pretty sure this made a lot of the difference.
  - blkhawk 2y ago
    Hey, Listestep what a blast from the past :) I rain it until it wouln't run sensible anymore in Windoes 10. I then ditched Windows for Linux soon after - I can recommend KDE Plasma if you want to have something thats sorta configureable enough like Litestep was.
    - cout 2y ago
      I remember running both litestep and windowblinds. I can't remember which one I liked better.
      - blkhawk 2y ago
        windowblinds is a window decoration customizer - LiteStep does nothing of the sort :) LiteStep completely replaces explorer.exe as the shell host and you can then customize what functions you want to have in your UI. The windows themself would stay looking the same.
- autoexec 2y ago

skeeter2020 2y ago

this is accurate; the 2000 line targeted business, and if you remember having a consumer computer with 2000 pro it didn't support a lot of hardware.

freedomben 2y ago
Can confirm. I upgraded my 98 box to 2000 and never did get some of my hardware working. When I told people I was using 2000 everybody assumed I had stolen it from work. I didn't. My friend stole it from work and shared it with me ;-)
- lproven 2y ago
  A license key of 11111-1111111 worked, if I remember correctly. :-)
486sx33 2y ago
Nice part of that pain came when XP was released. Win 2000 drivers mostly all happily loaded into Win XP !

voidfunc 2y ago

Drivers were kinda a mess from what I remember in 2000 especially on the graphics card side of things. The HW vendors needed more time to switch over.

stevetron 2y ago

Around the year 2000, I was studying computer science at a university. Most of their PC's ran on Windows 3.1. I was using it at home. But one day, Microsoft sent me an offer: I could purchase the student release of Windows 2000 workstation for a mere $25.00. I went for it, and found it better than the Windows NT nap-sayers at school said. I don't know why I was contacted. Probbably because of other Microsoft programs I'd bought at the student bookstore.

tracker1 2y ago
Windows 2000 was a pretty great OS. Used to enjoy using a Litestep shell instead of explorer. While it wasn't great for a lot of games, many did run fine. I liked it a lot better than OS/2 that I ran previously. I generally ran 2-4x the amount of RAM as most did. Still do. Pretty sure this made a lot of the difference.
- blkhawk 2y ago
  Hey, Listestep what a blast from the past :) I rain it until it wouln't run sensible anymore in Windoes 10. I then ditched Windows for Linux soon after - I can recommend KDE Plasma if you want to have something thats sorta configureable enough like Litestep was.
  - cout 2y ago
    I remember running both litestep and windowblinds. I can't remember which one I liked better.
    - blkhawk 2y ago
      windowblinds is a window decoration customizer - LiteStep does nothing of the sort :) LiteStep completely replaces explorer.exe as the shell host and you can then customize what functions you want to have in your UI. The windows themself would stay looking the same.
autoexec 2y ago