6 ms·
"Wow" is right. There's also this interesting gem right after: https://twitter.com/FedcourtJunkie/status/205371711233851392 https://twitter.com/FedcourtJunkie/s
by nknight 14y ago
"Wow" is right. There's also this interesting gem right after: https://twitter.com/FedcourtJunkie/status/205371711233851392 https://twitter.com/FedcourtJunkie/status/205371711233851392
> Juror said it was his opinion that more tech savvy jurors were less likely to go for limits on openness. Ie they were pro google
This really says it all. Ultimately Oracle can only win if the jury is borderline luddite.
- taligent 14y agoBeing non tech savvy does not make you a luddite.
- wtallis 14y agoNo, but it's getting pretty hard to argue that a randomly selected jury of Northern California citizens should be completely devoid of smartphone owners.
- alanh 14y agoWhy is a 9-3 split particularly surprising?
- nknight 14y agoFrankly, I didn't have much confidence in this jury. It was stacked to avoid techies, its findings on other copyright issues (e.g. rangecheck) didn't instill much confidence in me, and some of the questions that were emerging made me question their ability to understand complex issues and distinguish between basically being ordered to find infringement, and being asked to determine if it was really infringement. If you'd asked me what the count was likely to be, I probably would have told you something like 10-2 for Oracle.