6 ms·
Instead over 1 million of them are sent to concentration camps, abused and killed to harvest their organs. It's genocide eitherway. The issue isn't covered is r
by dragonmost 2y ago
Instead over 1 million of them are sent to concentration camps, abused and killed to harvest their organs. It's genocide eitherway.
The issue isn't covered is really the difference here.
- woooooo 2y agoA million killed to harvest their organs? You sure about that? Or was that a rhetorical thing.
- dragonmost 2y agoCan't find a reliable source right now but the report was from U.N's Gay McDougall
- woooooo 2y agoA million people chopped up for organs would presumably leave some significant evidence.
- dijit 2y agoBeware that reasoning. We only knew about the holocaust very late into the war and there were denials just as you claim right now. And indeed, when the Nazi's were losing they tried quite hard to hide the evidence, however it was so total and immutable in many cases that it could not be hidden, mostly because the allied powers controlled their lands and had free access to their previously governed population.. Without such access proof rarely escapes and when it does the total brutality is considered impossible; this is exactly what happened during world war 2.