6 ms·
I enjoyed the feeling when I made this connection talking with a startup doing this a while back. It's just a different "language" and although it's not a given
by devindotcom 2y ago
I enjoyed the feeling when I made this connection talking with a startup doing this a while back. It's just a different "language" and although it's not a given that LLMs can operate in it, it's a reasonable thing to try, and it turns out they can.
- dekhn 2y agoPersonally I think it was obvious that LLMs were going to be useful for protein modelling since the previous generation used HMMs very successfully. Pfam (a library of HMMs for classifying proteins into preexisting known families) is one of the most important resources we have because of the power of HMMs to model sequential language. I suspect we will need to move from sequential modelling to graphical modelling to level-up again, though.
- floobertoober 2y ago> I suspect we will need to move from sequential modelling to graphical modelling to level-up again, though. Out of curiosity, would you mind elaborating on this?
- dekhn 2y agoI don't work in the field so I'm probably just repeating something Hinton already said, but it seems to me like attempting to model things in reality that have graph-like structures (like interacting pairs of residues in a 3d protein structure) using sequences with finite context lengths is ultimately going to be less efficient than modelling graphs. My guess is this work is roughly describing that I think of: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mkearns/papers/barbados/jordan-tut.pdf https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mkearns/papers/barbados/jordan-tu... it could also be I completely misunderstand context in sequential models and what I'm describing is already being used, or has been evaluated and has been unsuccessful.