5 ms·
Why not `git archive`?
by icommentedtoday 2y ago
Why not `git archive`?
- bhaak 2y agoBecause I didn't know about it. Although if I look at its documentation, it's already a somewhat complicate invocation with unclear effects (lots of commandline options). Git seems to not be able to do KISS. git ls-files and tar is a simple thing everybody understands and can do without much issues.