Even still, both repos had READMEs [1][2] clearly meant to be read by the public. The archival was only successful years ago, with a failed snapshot as far back

Even still, both repos had READMEs [1][2] clearly meant to be read by the public. The archival was only successful years ago, with a failed snapshot as far back as 2021 [3]. This really seems like they forgot it was ever public. Now, this is only about it being a GitHub breach. Whether unlicensed (emenel/portfolio) or GPL (emenel/dust) code should be allowed in such datasets is a different matter. [1] https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/directory/?origin_url=https://github.com/emenel/portfolio https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/directory... [2] https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/directory/?origin_url=https://github.com/emenel/dust https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/directory... [3] https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/visits/?origin_url=https://github.com/emenel/portfolio https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/visits/?o...