5 ms·

Thanks for the feedback! I just extended the comment to touch on the "why" part. :) https://github.com/Dobiasd/articles/commit/53f360259ad8e64ca71f8626805cb674c

• latchkey 2y ago
  Don't leave me hanging, too specific about what?
  • happytoexplain 2y ago
    I'm not sure if you're actually suggesting that the author expound further on the concept of pseudocode, or if this is just humor.
    • latchkey 2y ago
      Mostly humor, but also a suggestion. Why? Because if it was real code I'd want the 'why' to be as specific as possible. It doesn't have to be a novel, but it also shouldn't be left open for interpretation. Too many times have I gotten some ancient piece of code and cursed the author (sometimes this is even myself) for either not documenting it well or it had a bug or whatnot. "OMG, what were they thinking when they wrote this code?!" I never want to be in the position where someone is cursing me.
  • Dobiasd 2y ago
    https://github.com/Dobiasd/articles/commit/b5342dd5072480800b1197a75383d4b8d6617ef1 https://github.com/Dobiasd/articles/commit/b5342dd5072480800... Better? :)
    • latchkey 2y ago
      That is fantastic. Much appreciated on the quick response. You're hired. =)