6 ms·
The state has ruled time and again; It has no duty to protect you and your property. Warren v. District of Columbia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._Dist
by a_gnostic 2y ago
The state has ruled time and again; It has no duty to protect you and your property.
Warren v. District of Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales
Davidson v. City of Westminster , 32 Cal.3d 197
http://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/davidson-v-city-westminster-28281 http://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/davidson-v-city-westminst...
Hartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) , 46 Cal.App.3d 6
http://www.lawlink.com/research/caselevel3/51629 http://www.lawlink.com/research/caselevel3/51629
Linda Riss v. City of New York
http://www2.newpaltz.edu/%7Ezuckerpr/cases/riss.htm http://www2.newpaltz.edu/%7Ezuckerpr/cases/riss.htm
DeShaney v. Winnebago County
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeShaney_v._Winnebago_County http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeShaney_v._Winnebago_County
Susman v. City of Los Angeles269 Cal. App. 2d 803
http://law.justia.com/cases/california/calapp2d/269/803.html http://law.justia.com/cases/california/calapp2d/269/803.html
South v. Maryland, 59 U.S. (How.) 396, 15 L.Ed.433 (1856)
http://www.endtimesreport.com/NO_AFFIRMATIVE_DUTY.htm http://www.endtimesreport.com/NO_AFFIRMATIVE_DUTY.htm
…and many more!
https://archive.is/MbIeH https://archive.is/MbIeH