5 ms·
> Yea, the dosage and labeling for sure needs work. I see 2000 IU doses regularly sold in stores and the bottle says you can take 2/day. Obviously no doctor wou
by chimeracoder 3y ago
> Yea, the dosage and labeling for sure needs work. I see 2000 IU doses regularly sold in stores and the bottle says you can take 2/day. Obviously no doctor would recommend that for anyone not sick.
That is simply not true. Doctors do recommend 2000-4000 IU for healthy patients all the time.
- JohnMakin 3y agoI should clarify by what I obviously meant that doctors would not recommend that as a DAILY dose - daily implying long-term use is okay.
- chimeracoder 3y ago> I should clarify by what I obviously meant that doctors would not recommend that as a DAILY dose - daily implying long-term use is okay. Yes, and I'm saying that this does in fact happen.
- NovemberWhiskey 3y agoConcur - I was diagnosed with vitamin D deficiency and my doctor prescribed an initial regimen of prescription tablets at 50,000 IU and then suggested 3,000-5,000 IU daily.
- smeej 3y agoMight also depend where you live. My doctor did as yours, but I live in northern New England where we don't typically expose our skin to the sun for months at a time. Perhaps doctors closer to the tropics assume at least a low level of sun exposure?
- toxicdevil 3y agoI was prescribed 3-5000 iu daily and then I changed doctors. When I asked about continuing the vitamin the new doctors said "I won't recommend doing a test because almost everyone has low vit d levels, even with daily supplements. Just keep taking the pills. As long as its not a very high dose you should be fine". My wife has a different doctor who does regular vitamin testing, she was prescribed 5000iu and a year and a half later her tests barely read "normal", still being on the borderline.
- t0bia_s 2y agoSupplements never replace beeing outside exposed to sun where your body got vit. D naturally.