8 ms·

Thanks for this. I just pulled one [dug in] that I assume got on me meters away from a fully eaten deer carcass :/ Tweezed it out best I could, H2O2'd and lig

Thanks for this. I just pulled one [dug in] that I assume got on me meters away from a fully eaten deer carcass :/ Tweezed it out best I could, H2O2'd and lightly cauterized it then Neosporin'd, but still gonna have to play the bullseye waiting game AFAIK... Got dang ticks!

nick7376182 3y ago
You can take a prophylactic dose of doxycycline for 1-2 days I believe. If you have a lot of ticks in your area a general physician should be familiar with that protocol.
_6hmp 3y ago
It takes time for a tick to transmit lyme disease, but you can also take a single dose of doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis if you think it was attached for a while and ask a doctor
- switchbak 3y ago
  Odd how the sibling comment got downvoted into oblivion for this, but you're right - prophylaxis is an option here, and last I checked it was the recommended course of action if you develop the bullseye ring. Note that the tests have high false negative rates, so still might be sensible if you have a negative test. Of course, these antibiotics are not without risk too.
  - lyme-educator 2y ago
    Some points correcting what's been posted here and above. A single dose of Doxycycline is not an effective prophylactic. It failed me and other people I know (after my doctor and I read over the CDC guideline that was misinformation). The original study supporting it was poor regarding how it was established as effective (required the bullseye rash). The bullseye rash does not appear for everyone. Depending on the attach point/strength, ticks pass along bacteria and/or viruses in minutes. Testing the tick and monitoring yourself for symptoms is always a good practice. I prefer clothing & topical solutions vs ingested chemicals. It would be nice to see support for natural consumption of ticks by fowl (chickens, turkeys, quail, etc), marsupial, etc.
    - switchbak 2y ago
      What I read was that the bullseye was considered sufficient evidence even without a positive test to administer antibiotics. I don't know the recommended dose, perhaps a single dose is not enough. What exactly are you correcting here?
- acomjean 2y ago
  They recommend that dose if it’s been attached more the 36 hours and it’s less than 72 hours since removed. I fell into this slot last fall and got a single dose of doxycycline. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/FS-Guidance-for-Clinicians-Patients-after-TickBite-508.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/FS-Guidance-for-Clinician...
zikduruqe 3y ago
Put it in the freezer as you wait the bullseye game. If you do think you have Lyme's disease then bring the tick with you to the doctor, so that they confirm it.
- neoromantique 2y ago
  First symptom of Lyme is very distinct red oval on a place that got bit, if you see it then evaluating the tick is kinda pointless at that point.
  - tohnjitor 2y ago
    Not every Lyme infection has a corresponding bullseye, or it will be in a location that you can't see easily. Therr are also other tick borne illnesses that can be quite dangerous.
    - neoromantique 2y ago
      TIL, thank you for informing me.

nick7376182 3y ago

You can take a prophylactic dose of doxycycline for 1-2 days I believe. If you have a lot of ticks in your area a general physician should be familiar with that protocol.

_6hmp 3y ago

It takes time for a tick to transmit lyme disease, but you can also take a single dose of doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis if you think it was attached for a while and ask a doctor

switchbak 3y ago
Odd how the sibling comment got downvoted into oblivion for this, but you're right - prophylaxis is an option here, and last I checked it was the recommended course of action if you develop the bullseye ring. Note that the tests have high false negative rates, so still might be sensible if you have a negative test. Of course, these antibiotics are not without risk too.
- lyme-educator 2y ago
  Some points correcting what's been posted here and above. A single dose of Doxycycline is not an effective prophylactic. It failed me and other people I know (after my doctor and I read over the CDC guideline that was misinformation). The original study supporting it was poor regarding how it was established as effective (required the bullseye rash). The bullseye rash does not appear for everyone. Depending on the attach point/strength, ticks pass along bacteria and/or viruses in minutes. Testing the tick and monitoring yourself for symptoms is always a good practice. I prefer clothing & topical solutions vs ingested chemicals. It would be nice to see support for natural consumption of ticks by fowl (chickens, turkeys, quail, etc), marsupial, etc.
  - switchbak 2y ago
    What I read was that the bullseye was considered sufficient evidence even without a positive test to administer antibiotics. I don't know the recommended dose, perhaps a single dose is not enough. What exactly are you correcting here?
acomjean 2y ago
They recommend that dose if it’s been attached more the 36 hours and it’s less than 72 hours since removed. I fell into this slot last fall and got a single dose of doxycycline. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/FS-Guidance-for-Clinicians-Patients-after-TickBite-508.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/FS-Guidance-for-Clinician...

zikduruqe 3y ago

Put it in the freezer as you wait the bullseye game. If you do think you have Lyme's disease then bring the tick with you to the doctor, so that they confirm it.

neoromantique 2y ago
First symptom of Lyme is very distinct red oval on a place that got bit, if you see it then evaluating the tick is kinda pointless at that point.
- tohnjitor 2y ago
  Not every Lyme infection has a corresponding bullseye, or it will be in a location that you can't see easily. Therr are also other tick borne illnesses that can be quite dangerous.
  - neoromantique 2y ago
    TIL, thank you for informing me.