7 ms·
Sounds like stakeholders are expecting waterfall guarantees without the overhead of proper planning and refinement. Honestly, the industry should move back to
by pylua 3y ago
Sounds like stakeholders are expecting waterfall guarantees without the overhead of proper planning and refinement.
Honestly, the industry should move back to waterfall.
- jroseattle 3y agoYes, we had some "stakeholder training" that was necessary. The biggest complaint: "I don't understand why this takes so long." Our stakeholders were mostly plant operations people -- users, not engineers. We re-framed the discussion to focus on WHAT they didn't understand. They didn't understand how software comes together, gets deployed or updated, etc. I explained that it wasn't important that they understand how that occurs (or, if they do, please join the engineering team!) This literally took pressure off of them to be knowledgeable. I pulled a few of them in as "first-pass quality control", ensuring what we built would work for them and their teams. Immediately, I had advocates for us and interested stakeholders willing to participate as partners.