6 ms·
Sure. But it’s hard to ignore that they are far harsher on Israel than any other country. But don’t take it from me. Take that from a senior editor who left HR
by jonbodner 3y ago
Sure. But it’s hard to ignore that they are far harsher on Israel than any other country.
But don’t take it from me. Take that from a senior editor who left HRW after 13 years: https://www.timesofisrael.com/outgoing-human-rights-watch-senior-editor-blasts-groups-infected-work-on-israel/ https://www.timesofisrael.com/outgoing-human-rights-watch-se...
- leereeves 3y agoHer objections include: "HRW’s initial reactions to the Hamas attacks...included the ‘context’ of ‘apartheid’ and ‘occupation’" And "political framing that could always contextualize and “explain” why Jewish Israeli lives were lost in Palestinian violence." It sounds like she wanted their coverage to be more one-sided. Explaining "the ‘context’ of ‘apartheid’ and ‘occupation’" is perfectly valid.