4 ms·
Rapid7's article on the topic[1] mostly focuses on the need for providing enough information to IT admins so they can understand the severity of the problem. Th
by gurchik 3y ago
Rapid7's article on the topic[1] mostly focuses on the need for providing enough information to IT admins so they can understand the severity of the problem. There are other unsaid reasons for this (credit/payment I'd imagine is part of it), but on face value doesn't this make sense? When Metabase[2] says "Upgrade your instance NOW" and they have a vuln that "allows unprivileged access to any Metabase instance" I upgraded immediately. When JetBrains[3] says "4 security problems have been fixed. We highly recommend installing this update as it includes a fix for a critical security vulnerability" then many people are not going to upgrade as quickly. Jetbrains eventually gave more information[4] but would they have done this if Rapid7 wasn't threatening to disclose it themselves?
^1: https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/06/06/the-hidden-harm-of-silent-patches/ https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/06/06/the-hidden-harm-...
^2: https://discourse.metabase.com/t/upgrade-your-metabase-instance-now/26062 https://discourse.metabase.com/t/upgrade-your-metabase-insta...
^3: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/teamcity/teamcity-2023-11-4-release-notes.html#Security https://www.jetbrains.com/help/teamcity/teamcity-2023-11-4-r...
^4: https://blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2024/03/additional-critical-security-issues-affecting-teamcity-on-premises-cve-2024-27198-and-cve-2024-27199-update-to-2023-11-4-now/ https://blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2024/03/additional-criti...
- lolinder 3y agoThis is a decent explanation for issuing a CVE and a clear disclosure immediately after a patch is available, but the claim in the article is that best practice is to reveal immediately regardless of whether there's a patch. That makes no sense to me.
- ziddoap 3y agoYou can read their actual disclosure policy here: https://www.rapid7.com/security/disclosure/ https://www.rapid7.com/security/disclosure/ They do not -- and the industry as a whole does not -- claim that that the best practice is to immediately reveal a vulnerability regardless of a patch.
- lolinder 3y agoThanks. That makes a lot more sense. The Register must have misinterpreted the controversy when they wrote this: > Rapid7 says it reported the two TeamCity vulnerabilities in mid-February, claiming JetBrains soon after suggested releasing patches for the flaws before publicly disclosing them. > Such a move is typically seen as a no-no by the infosec community, which favors transparency, but there's apparently a time and a place for these things.
- ziddoap 3y agoYes, this article is unfortunately disappointing and seems to have a bit of spin put on it, considering this is all pretty standard coordinated disclosure stuff.