5 ms·
As far as I remember, there was debate around that valuation. "Early investors filed suit in New York against FanDuel's board for breach of fiduciary duty in a
by longcrab 3y ago
As far as I remember, there was debate around that valuation.
"Early investors filed suit in New York against FanDuel's board for breach of fiduciary duty in allegedly undervaluing FanDuel to enrich themselves."
( FanDuel Wikipedia )
There was some unusual relationships in the deal, and the valuation of the company post-purchase was dramatically larger.
Not sure if suit is public, but article:
"The new lawsuit claims that the board – which allegedly included only one independent director and six directors tied to KKR and Shamrock – priced the value of FanDuel’s stake in the merged company at about $559 million. That number, the suit alleges, was no coincidence. Under FanDuel’s operative bylaws, preferred shareholders were due to receive all of the first $559 million from any merger."[1]
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-otc-fanduel/fanduel-founders-spin-juicy-tale-in-suit-against-kkr-shamrock-the-funds-have-a-different-story-idUSKCN20K38Z https://www.reuters.com/article/us-otc-fanduel/fanduel-found... ( "juicy tale?" )
- sokoloff 3y agoIt seems like the suit was settled in FanDuel's favor/against the early investors/employees. https://archive.is/vAaKC https://archive.is/vAaKC