7 ms·

Firefox 15 now supports in-content preferences

32 points by girishmony 14y ago

nodata 14y ago
I'd like to see per-tab offline mode, a-la https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226096 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226096
- obtu 14y ago
  in-content means the preferences dialog get changed to a tab (à la Chrome). It's not about changing preferences to be per-site (there are some per-site prefs in right-click, view page info, permissions).
stephenr 14y ago
Explain to me how this is a good thing?
- mhansen 14y ago
  It makes it easier for contributors to hack on if the code is HTML/JS/CSS. It'll let them iterate faster - just change code and reload. No recompilation needed.
- gcp 14y ago
  It's no longer a modal dialog. Seems like a simple GUI improvement.
  - crazygringo 14y ago
    Why does "no longer a modal dialog" = "GUI improvement"? This isn't obvious to me at all...
    - gcp 14y ago
      Because just looking at the preferences blocks everything else in Firefox? Given how important a browser is, this is quite annoying. A trivial example is opening up preferences and then wanting to Google to figure out how to configure something. Not possible in the current design.
  - Aloisius 14y ago
    On a Mac at least, the Preferences window is not modal. You can still interact with Firefox even though it is up. Is that not the case on other OSes?
    - gcp 14y ago
      On Windows it's modal. Dunno about the others.
      - idleloops 14y ago
        Not Modal on Nightly Linux.
- ibotty 14y ago
  you can search in your settings and so potentially navigate way faster.
hello_asdf 14y ago
I really don't care for Firefox's new versioning scheme. I'm still on Firefox 10 on Gentoo, and I don't feel much of a reason to upgrade. I felt that incrementing that number should be reserved for major changes. I didn't intend for this to be taken as a complaint about the Mozilla development team. It's just something I've found unusual in the development community. It's been confusing me, and I never understood their reasoning behind it.
- SquareWheel 14y ago
  Does it really matter though? It's an arbitrary number, and incrementing the major version just sets a clearer goal for each release cycle.
  - hello_asdf 14y ago
    No it really doesn't matter. It wasn't so much a complaint, and I didn't intend for it to seem that way. I just didn't understand the reasoning behind it. It's not something that I dislike about the Mozilla team. Just something that is unusual in the development community.
- BCM43 14y ago
  I don't feel much of a reason to upgrade. Security updates? IIRC they are not releasing security updates for non-current versions.
  - hello_asdf 14y ago
    Perhaps, I hadn't thought that any significant security issues had been found in recent versions. Are there any I should be concerned about? If not, my reasoning is that I don't want to break what is working perfectly fine for me as is. After looking at https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firef... there doesn't seem that there are any to be concerned about. However, in case you are right, I'm recompiling a more recent version of Firefox.
crazygringo 14y ago
For me, this is step backwards, because it breaks existing UI paradigms. Why is it a good thing for the preferences pane have to appear in a different place from where it does in every single other application on my OS? And this deliberately confuses application content versus Internet content. Do you have to scroll down to click "OK"? What if it isn't visible? Or should it be labelled "save"? Why learn a new dialog-style interface? And why on Earth does this need to be a tab -- are people going to be tabbing between their stock quotes, news, and browser Preferences tab?
- mhansen 14y ago
  I daresay by now users are more familiar with web-based UI paradigms than traditional OS paradigms. I think they'd spend more time interacting with web-based applications than traditional OS applications. If that's the case, then Firefox is actually adapting to people's expectation of the UI.
  - crazygringo 14y ago
    I dunno... people still use word-processors, spreadsheets, sometimes e-mail clients... For me, this still makes as much sense as Excel opening up its preferences as a new spreadsheet, or a 3D rendering program asking you to edit a 3D wireframe to change options. Content is content, application is application -- I don't understand why confusing the two could ever be a good thing.
  - idleloops 14y ago
    While there is room for innovation with web-based UIs, they are just really inconsistent. In fact Firefox sticks out like a sore thumb compared to other apps on my OS. And I find it a real annoyance. That's why there is a niche for a browser like Camino, that feels more native than Firefox on OSX. When I use MS Windows I really notice this, installers, application control panels, window titles and controls - seem to be all over the place. It's a minefield. Linux desktop suffers this too with different GUI toolkits - QT, GTK etc. There's a part of you that just adapts and gets used to it. But ultimately it's a pain. Compare the popular web browsers. Despite their convergence, the UI's are quite different.
SaulOfTheJungle 14y ago
I like this because the current options window is modal and often I need to change an option while browsing the web. I hope they do the same with the downloads list.
- joenathan 14y ago
  They already have, the new download manager landed in the nightlies about a week ago, no more download window to get lost. screen http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pjn0wvYUwbk/T5FWuH_MLUI/AAAAAAAAIjA/FC-5PRB3gOg/s1600/firefox-nightly-download-button.png http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pjn0wvYUwbk/T5FWuH_MLUI/AAAAAAAAIj...
gbaygon 14y ago
At this rate (and with Australis) firefox will end up looking exactly like chrome.

32 points by girishmony 14y ago

I'd like to see per-tab offline mode, a-la https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226096 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226096

obtu 14y ago
in-content means the preferences dialog get changed to a tab (à la Chrome). It's not about changing preferences to be per-site (there are some per-site prefs in right-click, view page info, permissions).

stephenr 14y ago

Explain to me how this is a good thing?

mhansen 14y ago
It makes it easier for contributors to hack on if the code is HTML/JS/CSS. It'll let them iterate faster - just change code and reload. No recompilation needed.
gcp 14y ago
It's no longer a modal dialog. Seems like a simple GUI improvement.
- crazygringo 14y ago
  Why does "no longer a modal dialog" = "GUI improvement"? This isn't obvious to me at all...
  - gcp 14y ago
    Because just looking at the preferences blocks everything else in Firefox? Given how important a browser is, this is quite annoying. A trivial example is opening up preferences and then wanting to Google to figure out how to configure something. Not possible in the current design.
- Aloisius 14y ago
  On a Mac at least, the Preferences window is not modal. You can still interact with Firefox even though it is up. Is that not the case on other OSes?
  - gcp 14y ago
    On Windows it's modal. Dunno about the others.
    - idleloops 14y ago
      Not Modal on Nightly Linux.
ibotty 14y ago
you can search in your settings and so potentially navigate way faster.

hello_asdf 14y ago

I really don't care for Firefox's new versioning scheme. I'm still on Firefox 10 on Gentoo, and I don't feel much of a reason to upgrade. I felt that incrementing that number should be reserved for major changes. I didn't intend for this to be taken as a complaint about the Mozilla development team. It's just something I've found unusual in the development community. It's been confusing me, and I never understood their reasoning behind it.

SquareWheel 14y ago
Does it really matter though? It's an arbitrary number, and incrementing the major version just sets a clearer goal for each release cycle.
- hello_asdf 14y ago
  No it really doesn't matter. It wasn't so much a complaint, and I didn't intend for it to seem that way. I just didn't understand the reasoning behind it. It's not something that I dislike about the Mozilla team. Just something that is unusual in the development community.
BCM43 14y ago
I don't feel much of a reason to upgrade. Security updates? IIRC they are not releasing security updates for non-current versions.
- hello_asdf 14y ago
  Perhaps, I hadn't thought that any significant security issues had been found in recent versions. Are there any I should be concerned about? If not, my reasoning is that I don't want to break what is working perfectly fine for me as is. After looking at https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firef... there doesn't seem that there are any to be concerned about. However, in case you are right, I'm recompiling a more recent version of Firefox.

crazygringo 14y ago

For me, this is step backwards, because it breaks existing UI paradigms. Why is it a good thing for the preferences pane have to appear in a different place from where it does in every single other application on my OS? And this deliberately confuses application content versus Internet content. Do you have to scroll down to click "OK"? What if it isn't visible? Or should it be labelled "save"? Why learn a new dialog-style interface? And why on Earth does this need to be a tab -- are people going to be tabbing between their stock quotes, news, and browser Preferences tab?

mhansen 14y ago
I daresay by now users are more familiar with web-based UI paradigms than traditional OS paradigms. I think they'd spend more time interacting with web-based applications than traditional OS applications. If that's the case, then Firefox is actually adapting to people's expectation of the UI.
- crazygringo 14y ago
  I dunno... people still use word-processors, spreadsheets, sometimes e-mail clients... For me, this still makes as much sense as Excel opening up its preferences as a new spreadsheet, or a 3D rendering program asking you to edit a 3D wireframe to change options. Content is content, application is application -- I don't understand why confusing the two could ever be a good thing.
- idleloops 14y ago
  While there is room for innovation with web-based UIs, they are just really inconsistent. In fact Firefox sticks out like a sore thumb compared to other apps on my OS. And I find it a real annoyance. That's why there is a niche for a browser like Camino, that feels more native than Firefox on OSX. When I use MS Windows I really notice this, installers, application control panels, window titles and controls - seem to be all over the place. It's a minefield. Linux desktop suffers this too with different GUI toolkits - QT, GTK etc. There's a part of you that just adapts and gets used to it. But ultimately it's a pain. Compare the popular web browsers. Despite their convergence, the UI's are quite different.

SaulOfTheJungle 14y ago

I like this because the current options window is modal and often I need to change an option while browsing the web. I hope they do the same with the downloads list.

joenathan 14y ago
They already have, the new download manager landed in the nightlies about a week ago, no more download window to get lost. screen http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pjn0wvYUwbk/T5FWuH_MLUI/AAAAAAAAIjA/FC-5PRB3gOg/s1600/firefox-nightly-download-button.png http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pjn0wvYUwbk/T5FWuH_MLUI/AAAAAAAAIj...

gbaygon 14y ago

At this rate (and with Australis) firefox will end up looking exactly like chrome.