6 ms·
https://www.wired.com/story/guerrilla-wikipedia-editors-who-combat-conspiracy-theories/ https://www.wired.com/story/guerrilla-wikipedia-editors-who-... They se
by jumelles 3y ago
https://www.wired.com/story/guerrilla-wikipedia-editors-who-combat-conspiracy-theories/ https://www.wired.com/story/guerrilla-wikipedia-editors-who-...
They seem to defend against conspiracy theories and falsehoods. Why are you calling them a "gang"? What are the "dominating"? Why is this bad?
- _aleph2c_ 3y agoThat article was written in 2018, since then they have been trashing on a retired admiral: Timothy Gallaudet. They have been disparaging David Grusch, who spoke under oath to the American congress and have undone the work of Nobel laureates trying to edit pages about physics. And yes, they are dominating, a team of editors will beat out an individual contributor on Wikipedia. I don't really care about their position, but they are an open conspiracy, and it's an interesting story.