5 ms·
The bang (!) sign would make more sense to me. It's already used in css to express priority (!important), so it's not much of a logical jump.
by kadjar 14y ago
The bang (!) sign would make more sense to me. It's already used in css to express priority (!important), so it's not much of a logical jump.
- bkardell 14y agoYes there has been lots of bike shedding. A lot of people, myself included, have lobbied that ! in CSS is already an abomination (because in normal programming it generally means 'not'). Currently the discussions/draft/etc don't match or agree on what the syntax or capabilities will be. Our :-hitch-has is based on the original :has proposal and the existing implementation in jQuery as we feel that this is the best (and clearly the most powerful since it allows you to express more).