22 ms·
Neither of those applies at all to Gemma, though? I'm still confused -- what are you trying to accomplish with this line of questioning?
by trisfromgoogle 3y ago
Neither of those applies at all to Gemma, though? I'm still confused -- what are you trying to accomplish with this line of questioning?
- verticalscaler 3y ago[flagged]
- trisfromgoogle 3y agoI've been completely honest, human-like, and non-evasive with you. I answered your questions directly and frankly. Every time, you ignored the honest and human-like answers to try and score some imaginary points. We're honestly trying our best to build open models *with* the community that you can tune and use to build neat AI research + products. Ignoring that in favor of some political narrative is really petty.
- verticalscaler 3y ago[flagged]
- wokwokwok 3y agoLet it go. You’re being flagged and downvoted on your threads because you’re being unreasonable, not because of some moderator level conspiracy. The argument you’re making is not falsifiable. If you want to pursue this line of argument, you need to pause, think about how you can confidently and unambiguously make substantive claims; for example, substantive examples from actually using these models. The way you’re currently arguing is not meaningful or compelling.
- verticalscaler 3y ago[dead]
- SquareWheel 3y agoThat user is clearly not working with the principle of charity in mind. I've flagged their comments, and would suggest disengaging with them.