5 ms·
the opposite is the case. from your link: "Archive.is’s owner is intentionally blocking 1.1.1.1 users"
by Hello71 3y ago
the opposite is the case. from your link: "Archive.is’s owner is intentionally blocking 1.1.1.1 users"
- bombcar 3y agoThe archive owner wants takedown requests to be forced to be cross-border, so he wants to know where the request is coming from so he can serve from a server in a different country. Cloudflare blocks the extension to DNS that allows that. If you don't care, you can set your DNS to bypass Cloudflare for those domains only.
- lxgr 3y agoI’ve known this for a while now but it never ceases to amaze me. This must be up there with “no copyright intended” in terms of misguided compliance strategies.
- radlad 3y agoIt's always appeared to be a matter of perspective, to me. That being said, by "Cloudflare has issues with archive.is" I very literally meant that they have issues with the DNS records served to them by Archive.is. (i.e. They do not support EDNS.)