6 ms·
There’s no need for genocide. Chill with the rhetoric. Just educate people on sexual health and offer contraceptives. It works.
by insider-trade 3y ago
There’s no need for genocide. Chill with the rhetoric.
Just educate people on sexual health and offer contraceptives. It works.
- whimsicalism 3y agoYou are not going to “educate people on sexual health” down to a population of 1 billion in a timescale where these concerns even matter.
- insider-trade 3y ago[flagged]
- insider-trade 3y ago1. try at all 2. realize that sometimes problems require multiple solutions 3. realize that sometimes multiple problems require empathy
- insider-trade 3y ago[flagged]
- whimsicalism 3y agoWe are having a disagreement over population ethics and the impact of AGW - I could hardly think of a less bro-y discussion if I tried. I absolutely support population control, but all of my replies have been in reference to the specific scenario suggested of lowering population to 1 billion.
- insider-trade 3y agoyou’re very specifically using rhetoric to: - bring up other problems, which is definitely relevant because problems intertwine, but you’re avoiding focusing on any points regarding any single issue at a time. You still have to consider items, even when there’s a collection. - bring vitriolic accusations (“GENOCIDE!”) into a discussion on plastic pollution, farming, and food supply. This is unacceptable.