6 ms·
I think any other interpretation is extremely naive.
by akaij 3y ago
I think any other interpretation is extremely naive.
- rimunroe 3y agoCould you explain why?
- fsflover 3y agoBecause accidentally this move will make more money for Apple. (Follow the money.)
- dylan604 3y agonaive people accept at face value PR speak. unwilling to look past that and look for other ulterior motives even less charitable ones would pretty much be textbook naivety to me.
- rimunroe 3y agoI didn’t ask because I think someone should take a company’s word at face value. I asked because the thing this company said in this particular instance aligned with what I’d heard from other (independent) parties and I wanted to know why this person seemed so sure about that being wrong.
- dylan604 3y agoNaive people also forget the best lies have some truth woven in.
- akaij 3y agoI don't think believing why the most valuable company in the world with the highest and thickest walls around its garden, and a track record of not playing nice with others, is doing this, requires much explanation except that they want to kill the possibility of anyone bypassing the toll gate to the said garden.
- shuckles 3y agoApple could support PWAs and enforce the same Core Technology Fee they do on them as they do for 3p distributed apps, so this argument makes no sense.
- commoner 3y agoApple has no way of enforcing any kind of platform fee for PWAs since the developer does not need to interact with Apple at all. This financial conflict of interest is why the availablity of the full PWA feature set is desirable to developers and undesirable to Apple.