6 ms·
What were the images of? Why doesn't the Guardian describe them instead of just putting in a bunch of weasel words. > the Guardian itself is regularly accused
by hypeit 3y ago
What were the images of? Why doesn't the Guardian describe them instead of just putting in a bunch of weasel words.
> the Guardian itself is regularly accused of having anti-Israel bias
That's definitely not been the case since Oct 7th. They've been extremely pro-Israel, just like all of the MSM.
- guiriduro 3y agoYep. Even the censoring and firing of the last of their decent cartoonists, Steve Bell, shows the Guardian can't even tolerate off-message satire when doing their masters' bidding.[0] They were half-decent under Rubsbridger, but how far have they fallen. [0] https://www.belltoons.co.uk/hotoffpress https://www.belltoons.co.uk/hotoffpress
- khokhol 3y agoThey've been extremely pro-Israel This is wildly overdrawn and lacking in substantial basis. Though I'm sure there are many who believe that any source besides Electronic Intifada (or equivalent to it in tone and selective reporting) is "extremely pro-Israel".