6 ms·
is the video available somewhere?
by 0x006A 3y ago
is the video available somewhere?
- RamblingCTO 3y agoWould also love to see that!
- 6510 3y ago[flagged]
- jerpint 3y ago> unconfirmed Jewish people Do you even think before you type?
- 6510 3y ago[flagged]
- jazzyjackson 3y agoit's impossible to tell what you are trying to communicate
- 6510 3y agoIt could possibly be that I was maybe perhaps joking? Lets try again... The guardian writes that ms analysts (plural) cite reports (plural) > Microsoft analysts cite reports saying disruption by group known as Cotton Sandstorm also reached audiences in UK and Canada Is this such report? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/security-insider/reports/iran-surges-cyber-enabled-influence-operations-in-support-of-hamas/ https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/security-i... > Iran’s cyber-enabled influence operations also continued to grow in sophistication in this latest phase. They better disguised their sockpuppets by renaming some and changing their profile photos to appear more authentically Israeli. Meanwhile they made use of new techniques we’ve not seen from Iranian actors, including using AI as a key component to its messaging. We assess Cotton Sandstorm disrupted streaming television services in the UAE and elsewhere in December under the guise of a persona called “For Humanity.” For Humanity published videos on Telegram showing the group hacking into three online streaming services and disrupting several news channels with a fake news broadcast featuring an apparently AI generated anchor that claimed to show images of Palestinians injured and killed from Israeli military operations (Figure 7 (same as in the guardian article)). News outlets and viewers in the UAE, Canada, and the UK reported disruptions in streaming television programming, including BBC, that matched For Humanity’s claims. > Iran’s operations worked toward four broad objectives: destabilization, retaliation, intimidation, and undermining international support for Israel. All four of these objectives also seek to undermine Israel and its supporters’ information environments to create general confusion and lack of trust. Undermine international well deserved support for [to quote the US judge] plausible genocide? I'm kinda offended by the idea it was not my own choice to not support it. Not to worry, my government fully supports all aspects of the PG including the rejection of the convention on the Rights of the Child. Besides lots of good reporting there is also hilarious nonsense: > In April and November, Iran demonstrated repeated success in recruiting unwitting Israelis to engage in on-the-ground activities promoting its false operations. In one recent operation, “Tears of War,” Iranian operatives reportedly succeeded in convincing Israelis to hang branded Tears of War banners in Israeli neighborhoods featuring a seemingly Al-generated image of Netanyahu and calling for his removal from office You know that feeling? You see your feet and hands move and you put up banners calling for some false operations you unwittingly don't support? Hate it when that happens. We should be happy they didn't have to consciously experience it. Pretty clever how those researchers identified this among hundreds of thousands protesting against bibi. https://www.npr.org/2023/07/22/1189627225/israel-protests-netanyahu-judiciary# https://www.npr.org/2023/07/22/1189627225/israel-protests-ne...
- 6510 3y agono
- SixDouble5321 3y agoI hope to see it too. This is equal parts cool and foreboding.