5 ms·
That makes sense. I guess I would just add that the users don’t know if it’s a good experience yet. Maybe it sounds good on paper but in practice it amounts to
by olah_1 3y ago
That makes sense. I guess I would just add that the users don’t know if it’s a good experience yet.
Maybe it sounds good on paper but in practice it amounts to a nothingburger and is essentially the same as manually moving instances in the fediverse.
- steveklabnik 3y agoIt is very different than manually moving instances in the Fediverse, in my understanding. For one, it's totally transparent to the people that are following. All of your data comes with you. You don't lose your posts, your followers don't lose following you. I know Mastodon has at least recently gained account portability to some degree, but https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moving/ https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moving/ has some serious drawbacks that aren't present in the AT model.
- Ericson2314 3y agoIn general, it seems like ActivityPub is terrible, and all the mastodon people are deluded or worse about its technical merits.
- steveklabnik 3y agoI feel like that is extremely uncharitable but you are entitled to your opinion.
- Ericson2314 3y agoWell, you are more public persona than I, so you have to be more diplomatic :)
- josephg 3y agoActivitypub is the federation equivalent of an at-home 3d printer. It’s easy enough to understand how it works and do stuff with it. And very hackable. Bluesky is trying to be more like Firefox: it’s much more complex and built by experts to be well optimised for the problem it’s solving. But it’s much harder for lay people to understand how it works internally.