7 ms·
Agree! I'll go further. PowerShell covers a lot of the concerns in the OP out of the box. It is extremely well thought out and is one of my favorite cli models
by ojintoad 3y ago
Agree!
I'll go further. PowerShell covers a lot of the concerns in the OP out of the box. It is extremely well thought out and is one of my favorite cli models to buy into.
- bigstrat2003 3y agoPowershell is just plain a great shell. Blows all the *sh variants out of the water. I'd love for it to gain traction in Linux (so that, for example I could use it as my shell on my desktop) but I don't really see that happening.
- partdavid 3y agoWhat are the things that are stopping you? I use MacOS on my personal machine and Linux for various shellboxes and I switched to Powershell years ago and haven't looked back. Occasionally I invoke bash as a language runtime for checking shell script stuff, the way I would any other language's REPL, but for a shell? Powershell is strictly better. The one actual problem with Powershell in this area is quoting for external commands. It's solvable in scripts by replacing certain things with double-quoted equivalents but not really interactively, and it is an occasional pain (though I still think it's overall less of a problem than quoting in general in bash and its ilk).