5 ms·
The WSJ in fact https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-vision-pro-review-39f2d82e https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-vision-pro-review-39f2d82e
by Molomby 3y ago
The WSJ in fact https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-vision-pro-review-39f2d82e https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-vision-pro-review-39f2d82e
- morkalork 3y agoWow that's actually terrifying! The best part is while watching their cool video showcasing how terrifying it was, the WSJ exemplified why in part by jamming an ad right in there when I tried to skip ahead. Hope a full screen ad never blocks the view of someone skiing, it might end badly.
- tanseydavid 3y agoOK I am a snob, but wearing VisionPro while on the mountain skiing -- that's just plain wrong. What are they thinking?
- matt-attack 3y agoStruggling to see what’s so wrong about it. I can imagine a future where AR goggles are worn by most everyone regardless of the activity.
- c0balt 3y agoThe AVP is not AR though. Regardless of passthrough and their "Spatial Computing" marketing. It's a VR headset that will black out, and not stop "augmenting", the moment the battery get's disconnected. If you're skiing that might very well be the difference between hitting a tree (or worse, another person) and avoiding it.
- bloppe 3y agoGuarding against people doing shit that goes against common sense -- as well as Apple's "very explicit" warnings -- while using a third party battery that maybe might somehow malfunction, is an annoying reason for them to make a decision that costs me extra money.
- justinclift 3y agohttps://archive.is/7TnUB https://archive.is/7TnUB