5 ms·

This aged well - https://github.com/ravendb/ravendb/issues/13218#issuecomment-987884177 https://github.com/ravendb/ravendb/issues/13218#issuecomment...

• ukd1 3y ago
  Tickets related to this report from Aphyr: - https://github.com/ravendb/ravendb/issues/17928 https://github.com/ravendb/ravendb/issues/17928 - https://github.com/ravendb/ravendb/issues/17927 https://github.com/ravendb/ravendb/issues/17927
  • nemothekid 3y ago
    Very amusing what marketing will come up with; RavenDB doesn't support actual transactions, but supports "business" transactions.
• progbits 3y ago
  They claim to run that test on any changes but in fact might not be testing anything at all according to this footnote in the Jepsen report: > RavenDB’s Jepsen test may not have measured anything at all: at least in the most recent revision, the generator included no client operations of any kind. Remember folks, if you can't get your test to fail by intentionally breaking the implementation, you don't have a test.