7 ms·

Google and Facebook are the kings of plausible deniability. Everything they do is meant to collect personal data, but they always have the perfect excuse for d

Google and Facebook are the kings of plausible deniability. Everything they do is meant to collect personal data, but they always have the perfect excuse for doing it.

jonursenbach 14y ago
Yes, because them knowing if you're an organ donor actually matters to them in the long run.
ceejayoz 14y ago
How do you propose Google or Facebook would profit from knowing you're an organ donor, beyond simply "our employees might need an organ someday"?
- WiseWeasel 14y ago
  That is actually likely to be a valuable bit of demographic data. It's one of the rare pieces of information that indicates altruism, along with charitable giving. Many advertisers would like to be able to target organ donors.
  - drivingmenuts 14y ago
    > Many advertisers would like to be able to target organ donors. The horror running thru my mind right now has pretty much made me decide never to donate anything every again.
  - whackberry 14y ago
    > It's one of the rare pieces of information that indicates altruism, along with charitable giving. Depending on your region, being a registered organ donor in fact says a lot about your previous medical history. HIV status, etc...
    - makomk 14y ago
      In Canada it also apparently used to potentially say something about your sexual orientation as well, at least if you were male - gay men were barred from donating organs a few years ago.
      - whackberry 14y ago
        Interesting fact, TIL.
        tomjen3 14y ago
        That is the case in many countryis with blood. The Danish blood bank ran into an issue a few years ago where they warned of a possible blood shortage a few years ago and they then turned down blood from (healthy) male gays. You can't donate if you had sex with a single male 30 years ago, but I can sleep with all the females I want and still donate.
        dspillett 14y ago
        Those rules came in in the early 80s when we barely had a clue about HIV/AIDS and one of the few things that were clear was that gay men were a higher risk group (though we didn't know why). Given there are no doubt reliable tests to find and discard blood carrying such things, I'd be interested to know why the rules have not been removed and such tests put in place (it could be that governments don't want a public argument with certain narrow minded loud voiced religious groups, or it could be that the tests are just too time consuming or otherwise expensive).
        tomjen3 14y ago
        Religious groups don't have much power here and the rules still exist. But blood donation rules are fucked. I am banned for life from donating blood in the US -- because I spend more the 3 (or is it 5) years in Europe (I was born here). Apparently every european is considered so likely to have mad cow disease that you are better of not getting our blood at all. Like I said, the rules are ridiculous.

Google and Facebook are the kings of plausible deniability. Everything they do is meant to collect personal data, but they always have the perfect excuse for doing it.

jonursenbach 14y ago

Yes, because them knowing if you're an organ donor actually matters to them in the long run.

ceejayoz 14y ago

How do you propose Google or Facebook would profit from knowing you're an organ donor, beyond simply "our employees might need an organ someday"?

WiseWeasel 14y ago
That is actually likely to be a valuable bit of demographic data. It's one of the rare pieces of information that indicates altruism, along with charitable giving. Many advertisers would like to be able to target organ donors.
- drivingmenuts 14y ago
  > Many advertisers would like to be able to target organ donors. The horror running thru my mind right now has pretty much made me decide never to donate anything every again.
- whackberry 14y ago
  > It's one of the rare pieces of information that indicates altruism, along with charitable giving. Depending on your region, being a registered organ donor in fact says a lot about your previous medical history. HIV status, etc...
  - makomk 14y ago
    In Canada it also apparently used to potentially say something about your sexual orientation as well, at least if you were male - gay men were barred from donating organs a few years ago.
    - whackberry 14y ago
      Interesting fact, TIL.
      - tomjen3 14y ago
        That is the case in many countryis with blood. The Danish blood bank ran into an issue a few years ago where they warned of a possible blood shortage a few years ago and they then turned down blood from (healthy) male gays. You can't donate if you had sex with a single male 30 years ago, but I can sleep with all the females I want and still donate.
        dspillett 14y ago
        Those rules came in in the early 80s when we barely had a clue about HIV/AIDS and one of the few things that were clear was that gay men were a higher risk group (though we didn't know why). Given there are no doubt reliable tests to find and discard blood carrying such things, I'd be interested to know why the rules have not been removed and such tests put in place (it could be that governments don't want a public argument with certain narrow minded loud voiced religious groups, or it could be that the tests are just too time consuming or otherwise expensive).
        tomjen3 14y ago
        Religious groups don't have much power here and the rules still exist. But blood donation rules are fucked. I am banned for life from donating blood in the US -- because I spend more the 3 (or is it 5) years in Europe (I was born here). Apparently every european is considered so likely to have mad cow disease that you are better of not getting our blood at all. Like I said, the rules are ridiculous.