There's a 200+ page Code of Points[1] that determines how much each skill is worth as well as each error. At the elite level, there's a panel of 9 judges for ea

There's a 200+ page Code of Points[1] that determines how much each skill is worth as well as each error. At the elite level, there's a panel of 9 judges for each event, divided into judges who tally the execution score and the difficulty score, and the reference panel that effectively audits the execution score.[2] The difficulty and execution scores are averaged. This is how you can get three-decimal scores due to averaging. Here is an example of a judge's score sheet.[2] (Nevertheless, there are still issues with bias, where athletes or teams who benefit from a particular judge's biases might have their errors more gently scored. For example, on the bars, gymnasts are required to hit a handstand position within a 10-degree range of vertical. But a judge who is impacted by a bias, or a certain viewing position, many not notice that a particular handstand was at 15 degrees, and not deduct accordingly. This is where the AI judging may be particularly helpful.) [1] https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_2022-2024%20WAG%20COP.pdf https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_2022-2... [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYjhFnaoF90&t=408s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYjhFnaoF90&t=408s [3] https://www.nbcolympics.com/news/gymnastics-101-scoring https://www.nbcolympics.com/news/gymnastics-101-scoring