9 ms·
> By now, everyone knows that serverless doesn't actually mean without servers; it just means using someone else's servers. What? Is this some kind of confusin
by SnazzyJeff 3y ago
> By now, everyone knows that serverless doesn't actually mean without servers; it just means using someone else's servers.
What? Is this some kind of confusing reference to lambda and competing providers? As far as I know most of computing is serverless.
- Dylan16807 3y agoIn my experience when someone says the specific word "serverless" they mean "lambda and competing providers" 100% of the time.
- yegle 3y agoThis usually refers to the billing model of the computation. Serverless products usually are charging by # of invocations or CPU times, whereas "server-full" products charge you a multiply of "# of servers".
- zozbot234 3y agoThe proper term for that is "shared hosting". Serverless is just technobabble.