5 ms·
I agree, this reminds me RFC 1925 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1925 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1925), that states: "With sufficient
by z_ack 3y ago
I agree, this reminds me RFC 1925 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1925 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1925), that states:
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead"
I interested to this topic after watching this video related to a presentation of an engineer owner of Youtube channel in presence of NASA staff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJsPvmFixU&pp=ygUZc21hcnRlciBldmVyeSBkYXkgYXJ0ZW1pcw%3D%3D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJsPvmFixU&pp=ygUZc21hcnRlc...
so I read the documentation and , yes , I agree.
Anyway, the NASA book he mentions is really worth to read.
- z_ack 3y agoPS: NASA , I really want to watch the mission live on TV, like my grandfather, so please don't make flying pigs.