11 ms·
One of the problems is that the UK legal system has a presumption that computers are reliable. They are assumed to be working properly unless proved otherwise,
by ChocMontePy 3y ago
One of the problems is that the UK legal system has a presumption that computers are reliable. They are assumed to be working properly unless proved otherwise, which shifts the burden of proof on the person trying to claim that they are not working properly.
Many commentators are saying that this presumption should be changed:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/12/update-law-on-computer-evidence-to-avoid-horizon-repeat-ministers-urged https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/12/update-law-o...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2024/01/15/law-on-reliability-of-computer-evidence-should-change-say-it-experts/?sh=493fc3b82b14 https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2024/01/15/law-o...
- thom 3y agoThis was coupled by the victims being lied to that they were the only ones. Had they known this was systematic they could have mounted a more effective defence.
- 127361 3y agoSo does that mean guilty until proven innocent? If I'm correct here, then that's utterly sickening.
- dukeyukey 3y agoYou have to assume that at some point though, right? There are so many layers of software it's never gonna be possible to inspect it all the way down.