8 ms·
A hash doesn't work without solving all of the same problems their provenance classifier solves: you need a way to be able to detect the steganogram even after
by selalipop 3y ago
A hash doesn't work without solving all of the same problems their provenance classifier solves: you need a way to be able to detect the steganogram even after the image has been modified.
- posting_mess 3y ago> you need a way to be able to detect the steganogram even after the image has been modified. True, but not really. If you look at any suggested method to prevent the spread of CSAM "at scale" its based on large "hash databases" and not fancy classifiers (yet, if you can't develop one, and yes they have "problems" because they dont only contain hashes for "bad" files - "bad" being "locale" dependent). Also you need to consider at FAANG scale (where election interference matters), "just send TB's of data a day to our API" doesn't actually "scale" - nobody's ever paying those API/bandwidth fee's (as much as we'd like them to). It would be much cheaper for OpenAI to run this AI on all the images they produced and publish hashes for ones the model thought was "bad". But they never would because then they'd become "censors" - its a complicated world where nobody wants any blame.
- selalipop 3y agoThe hashing algorithms in question require solving all the same problems as the classifiers: they're perceptual hashes not cryptographic. Look at how NeuralHash is implemented.