6 ms·

I agree with the sentiment, but it's important to add that this should only happen if it's proven to the criminal standard of proof, in a court room, that she w

I agree with the sentiment, but it's important to add that this should only happen if it's proven to the criminal standard of proof, in a court room, that she was complicit.

pi-e-sigma 3y ago
Why can't we apply the same standard of proof that was used to prosecute and sentence innocent people in this scandal?
- lostlogin 3y ago
  Why can’t this burden of proof be applied when giving out awards? The various paedophiles and fraudsters might be caught earlier. Another one today: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/12/british-conductor-jan-latham-koenig-charged-with-child-sexual-abuse https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/12/british-cond...
- krisoft 3y ago
  Because two wrongs doesn't make a right.
  - pi-e-sigma 3y ago
    On the contrary. Applying unjust law to the powerful and well connected people is the best and quickest way to get such law removed.
123pie123 3y ago
the legal responsibility of a director is different. she is accountable (along with other senior directors) for issues caused by the company "A director can be found to be personally liable for a company offence if they consented or connived in an illegal activity, or caused it through neglect of their duties." https://www.girlings.com/latest/when-does-a-director-assume-individual-liability https://www.girlings.com/latest/when-does-a-director-assume-... so she either knows about this or is negligent - either way jail time should be given