5 ms·
That's pretty much the entire point of many publications. You think readers of Financial Times aren't reading FT in the hopes of getting their own material gain
by jmvoodoo 3y ago
That's pretty much the entire point of many publications. You think readers of Financial Times aren't reading FT in the hopes of getting their own material gain? What about Wall St analysts? Consuming something for gain is not copyright infringement, distributing it for gain is.
- edent 3y agoThe people who read the FT usually pay for it. Most of these LLMs are trained on a set of pirated content that they didn't pay for - https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2023/07/fruit-of-the-poisonous-llama/ https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2023/07/fruit-of-the-poisonous-llam... Most copyrighted works will specifically say that the customer / user is prohibited from storing and reproducing those works.
- Vvector 3y agoYet fair use can trump the owner's prohibitions. Your ISP can cache copyrighted materials, storing and reproducing them for other customers. Your browser stores the copyrighted images in your cache and 'reproduces' them if you browse the same page again. It's a complicated area, not clear cut at all