39 ms·
It's not the same.
by frenchman99 3y ago
It's not the same.
- omneity 3y agoThere are minor differences, but the similarity is indeed striking.
- mrunkel 3y agoIt's an anthropomorphized bao bun. How much variance can you expect? https://imgur.com/a/tNRuEpb https://imgur.com/a/tNRuEpb
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- emptysongglass 3y agoIt looks extremely similar to me. I would not be pleased if I was behind Bun.
- richbell 3y agoThe only real similarity is that it's a bao bun with a face, which Bun didn't create the concept of.
- FringeXT 3y agoWho cares? It’s not like they’re in a remotely related niche. Nobody’s gonna confuse the two.
- yencabulator 3y agoSounds like Bun chose a bad logo then. They're not going to own the concept of a bao bun with a face.
- shwouchk 3y agoWhat about the concept of a window? Can anyone own that? Or, a cat octopus? How about a discarded piece of fruit?
- richbell 3y agoThere is nothing distinct about a window or piece of fruit. Obviously if you made an operating system called Windows and used a window as a logo that would be trademark violation, but there's nothing stopping me from opening John's Windows with the logo being a window.
- shwouchk 3y agoSure, a trivial strawman example. But then, if you made not an OS but rather say, a search engine called “pane.io” and used a logo of a 4 pane window of different colors ? I am open to being wrong here but I doubt it would have gone smoothly.