10 ms·
Oh wow, didn't expect to see my paper here. Happy to answer any questions!
by trombonechamp 3y ago
Oh wow, didn't expect to see my paper here. Happy to answer any questions!
- defrost 3y agoATM I can only read the lead .. and then it's paywall and not yet on sci-hub :-) Would I be right in guessing that things are only stable until the eigenvalues fall to the floor and any further dimensional reductions will easily perturb?
- ayhanfuat 3y agoI think this is the preprint version https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.20.545619v1.full https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.20.545619v1....
- trombonechamp 3y agoSorry, I didn't have funding to pay the open access fees. The published version is very similar to the preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.20.545619v1 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.20.545619v1 Alternatively, if you want the full version, PNAS gave me some eprints to share so just email me (link on my site in my profile) and I will send you a copy! Not sure what you mean by "things are stable" in this context, could you elaborate?
- theGnuMe 3y agoDo you think this also applies to kernel density estimation? I've used the R program and noticed extra density peaks that I wasn't able to explain except as artifacts. I guess it could've been picking up a mixture of distributions... but the densities appeared periodic if that makes any sense?
- trombonechamp 3y agoThis is something a bit different, the effect in the paper comes from the eigenvectors of the data matrix. I'm no expert on kernel density estimation, but since it is basically just convolution, I would guess the effect you are describing comes from multiplication in Fourier space.
- theGnuMe 3y agoThanks! Makes sense.. your paper is very good. It stresses the importance of understanding the mathematical tools we use and if we don’t how it can lead us astray.