8 ms·
That's nurture, not nature.
by CodeWriter23 3y ago
That's nurture, not nature.
- gmadsen 3y agoim not sure completely. There is probably inherent traits related to leadership/followership , and a cognitive bias to assume integrity of leaders seems plausible. Before society, might literally meant right.
- CodeWriter23 3y ago> traits related to leadership/followership , and a cognitive bias to assume integrity of leaders seems plausible Also learned behavior.
- gmadsen 3y agosure, my point still stands. It is a reasonable evolutionary hypothesis that groups that err on the side of trusting a leader succeed more that distrustful groups. Obviously there is a learned behavior component. I'm just not certain its completely that.
- thaumasiotes 3y ago> Before society, might literally meant right. "Before society"? How many times have you seen someone argue that a particular action was morally wrong for no other reason than that it was illegal?