4 ms·
Spotify made a gamble that having some headline Podcasters would build the listener market. Podcasters release regularly and have a different potential for bec
by badcppdev 3y ago
Spotify made a gamble that having some headline Podcasters would build the listener market. Podcasters release regularly and have a different potential for becoming viral compared to musicians so it's a valid commercial decision to make.
Seems like their headline gambles didn't work but googling suggests that the podcast listener market increased 10% in the last year so I think they'll probably try again.
- danpalmer 3y agoAnecdotally, most of the podcasts I listen to advertise as being on Spotify, especially the ones that skew towards a more mainstream audience. I think Spotify's podcast play has largely worked to gain the mindshare, it's really just them and Apple Podcasts. I suspect this means that Spotify subscribers are listening to plenty of podcasts, but perhaps podcasts failed to bring new listeners into Spotify.
- cupofjoakim 3y agoFor what it's worth Spotify is the most popular podcast platform in the US, with 25% of the userbase: https://explodingtopics.com/blog/podcast-listeners#podcast-platform-usage https://explodingtopics.com/blog/podcast-listeners#podcast-p... I'd say that gamble in particular worked. Not so sure others will though, audio books feels like it will be a dud.
- sdenton4 3y ago25% market share is a bit lackluster, though? Podcasting has also been called the slowest growing new medium in the history of new media. I can't imagine it's earning its keep, relative to those big initial payouts. Meanwhile, the shows that are brought into subscription-only world systematically fail to attract new listeners; it is hard to use podcast exclusives to grow market share. Especially the talking head variety, which exist in abundance outside the pay wall.
- cupofjoakim 3y agoI both agree and disagree with you here. The expectation of the podcasting business to be full of great opportunities and monetary gain was (probably) misguided, but 25% market share in an established market in just a couple of years when there were big players holding a majority share is still a huge feat. Will it pay off? Probably not. But is 25% a big share? Yes.
- lotsofpulp 3y agoApple Music (Jun 2015) and Google Play Music (Nov 2011) launched after Spotify (Jul 2011 in the US). I think the 4 year delay by Apple is what allowed Spotify to become so popular in the first place. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Music https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Music https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Play_Music https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Play_Music https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotify https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotify The problem for Spotify is that they need a far bigger share of the market to be able to have negotiating power against the 3 record labels that they have to buy the music from. Apple/Alphabet/Amazon do not care as much because re-selling the music at cost or even as a loss leader is not a big deal to them.
- SahAssar 3y agoThis whole subthread is about podcasts, and in that space apple was pretty early (2005 in itunes, 2012 as a standalone app) and spotify was very late.
- lotsofpulp 3y agoOops, I missed that distinction. Thanks for correction.
- badcppdev 3y agoApple and Google have 20% and 16% respectively. Considering the amazing platform boost that those two giants have I think 25% is very impressive. But I agree that podcastings growth has been very slow. I think that there are a lot of factors influencing that. The biggest in my opinion is that listening to a podcast is more intimate than any other media (including broadcast radio) and that factor both slows uptake and decreases churn. Not a marketer though so just making that up.