7 ms·

Wouldn't open source mean you can recreate the model from scratch by knowing the training data? There is a weird definition of open source that creeps in here.

Wouldn't open source mean you can recreate the model from scratch by knowing the training data? There is a weird definition of open source that creeps in here. Llama2 is effectively, proprietary compiled software. GPT-4 is proprietary compiled and hosted as SaaS. We have yet to see a true open source LLM... AI/ML is reinventing so many terms it's a bit annoying.

cactusplant7374 3y ago
If we did have access to the training data wouldn’t all these organizations be sued for distributing copyright works? It appears all my favorite books have been scanned by Open AI. I am assuming that they didn’t purchase them.
- seeknotfind 3y ago
  Library corpus sets must be available for purchase for research or machine learning. Is the only way to buy each individual books? People could go to the library to learn. ML should have the same opportunity.
  - cactusplant7374 3y ago
    I support Altman and his team showing up at the library. No argument there.
JieJie 3y ago
Quake is Open Source, Quake's data files are not. Llama2 is actually more open than Quake.