5 ms·
TikTok is a private company and your use of their service is not a right.
by alphanullmeric 3y ago
TikTok is a private company and your use of their service is not a right.
- boredpeter 3y agoMy criticism of there being a few corporate gatekeepers of communication that are bullied by the government to censor content it doesn’t like is valid. You’re free to believe whatever neocon libertarian nonsense you wish.
- alphanullmeric 3y agoI don’t support any government bullying of private companies, although I’m sure any level of consistency would be unfamiliar to people like you. Should TikTok be allowed to control what goes onto their service? That’s a yes or no question.
- shove 3y agoThe government bullying left-leaning foreign governments is chill though, right guys?
- alphanullmeric 3y agoNo. The US government should stay out of other countries business’. They should even stay out of NATO. But again, I’m sure you don’t have that level of consistency.
- shove 3y agoI’m an anarchist. The US government shouldn’t exist in the first place.
- mensetmanusman 3y agoif not them, then you! or roving gun gangs :)
- alphanullmeric 3y agoDoes your anarchism extend to the aforementioned left leaning foreign governments?
- boredpeter 3y ago[flagged]
- alphanullmeric 3y agoOh this is hilarious. Not only do you confirm that you wouldn't support them doing what they choose to with their service in the absence of government intervention, you would actively support the same government intervention you pretended to be against if it meant you could force them to do something you benefit from. If you wanted to prove that consistency wasn't exclusive to me you've done a pretty poor job. Combing through someone's account to avoid a yes or no question is especially pathetic.
- boredpeter 3y agoWow the world has nuances. Who would’ve thought?
- grunka_lunka 3y agoExpecting people on this site to thing is a little much, tbf.
- dang 3y agoWe've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site guidelines. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with. It will eventually get your main account banned as well. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- dang 3y agoWe've banned this account for using HN exclusively for ideological battle. Regardless of your ideology, that's not what HN is for, and it destroys what is for. Normally I'd warn someone before banning, but (a) I couldn't find a single comment in your account history that wasn't like this, and (b) you've been breaking other site guidelines regularly as well, such as the ones against snark, name-calling, and so on. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
- junofan 3y ago[flagged]
- boredpeter 3y agoI believe that in a free democratic society people should be allowed to read a letter written by an Islamic fundamentalist who orchestrated the largest terrorist attack against the United States. I believe people should be allowed to form their own opinions about his motives beyond what US government propagandists want the US public to believe. Contrary to public belief, I don’t think they did it because they hate our freedom. And I think if you do believe that and you also see no problem with platform after platform trying to scrub the document from public view then you’ve got your head on backwards.
- flextheruler 3y agoPeople aren’t allowed to read something because it isn’t on TikTok is certainly not a take I’d expect to hear from someone rallying against America. Typically that’s a right wing conservative argument that Trump and Fox News parrot about Alex Jones and what not.
- flashback2199 3y agoI think most would agree that writing shouldn't get banned like 1984 style, but tiktok picks and chooses random videos to shove in people's faces to watch, so it's not like users would have looked up this letter and were prevented from reading it, it sounds like they're trying to prevent videos about it from being shoved in people's faces who weren't looking for it, it's a bit different don't you think?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- abracadaniel 3y agoAnd what if the corporate gatekeepers censor themselves due to market forces instead? Like advertisers threatening to pull funding because they don’t think it’s a good look for them.
- krapp 3y agoOutside of coercion from government, self-censorship is just an expression of personal liberty and freedom of association, isn't it? You can't believe in free speech and also believe platforms should be forced to publish speech they don't want, or advertisers to associate themselves with it.
- mistermann 3y agoSimilarly, the airspeed of a European swallow is roughly 20.1 miles per hour.