8 ms·
It’s not a single layer, it is designed the same way apples service runs. This is addressed in the article.
by ripply 3y ago
It’s not a single layer, it is designed the same way apples service runs. This is addressed in the article.
- olliej 3y agoIn that case the complaints other comments people are making are simply wrong. There isn't a privacy concern here, I think google has just burned so much trust that the _assumption_ is now that the goal is tracking.
- JimDabell 3y agoAs justinclift points out elsewhere in this discussion, the article may have misreported that: > We are considering using 2 hops for improved privacy. A second proxy would be run by an external CDN, while Google runs the first hop. This ensures that neither proxy can see both the client IP address and the destination. — https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection#core-requirements https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection#core-requireme... If they choose to go ahead with the second hop it would be the same as Apple’s approach. But it sounds like this has not been committed to yet.
- olliej 3y agoThis is what I was unclear on - I couldn't tell if this was one-hop (and so tremendously invasive "privacy"), or two hops through an independent 3rd party (and so actually a privacy feature).