8 ms·
It’s in the EULA. They don’t deny it and it’s their right. The problem is RMS and all the people supporting FOSS and the GPL say Red Hat, and any other company
by mogwire 3y ago
It’s in the EULA. They don’t deny it and it’s their right.
The problem is RMS and all the people supporting FOSS and the GPL say Red Hat, and any other company, are well with in their rights to have that clause.
And this causes people, who didn’t pay for RHEL, won’t pay for Rocky or Alma or any other clone to hate a company they never supported.
- worthless-trash 3y agohttps://www.redhat.com/licenses/Red_Hat_GPLv2-Based_EULA_20191118.pdf https://www.redhat.com/licenses/Red_Hat_GPLv2-Based_EULA_201... Are you sure ?
- mogwire 3y agohttps://www.redhat.com/licenses/Appendix_1_Global_English_20230309.pdf https://www.redhat.com/licenses/Appendix_1_Global_English_20... Unauthorized Use of Subscription Services. Any unauthorized use of the Subscription Services is a material breach of the Agreement. Unauthorized use of the Subscription Services includes: [...] (d) using Subscription Services in connection with any redistribution of Software
- worthless-trash 3y agoIANAL but Subscription services in this case abusing Red Hats CDN/Support, not the software.