5 ms·
A good breakdown. There are also a handful of true grammar schools left. These are free to attend, but are selective based on ability. There is debate about th
by lambda_garden 3y ago
A good breakdown.
There are also a handful of true grammar schools left. These are free to attend, but are selective based on ability. There is debate about the extent to which raw ability is really being tested, and not preparedness for the test.
There are also private schools that call themselves grammar schools. These were once free and selective, but converted to fee-paying at some point. They like the prestige of being called a "grammar" but don't be fooled!
The lack of true grammar schools has been a big hit to social mobility in the UK. Now, getting into a grammar requires not just passing a test, but also having parents rich enough to buy a house in the catchment area. Public school alumni dominate top industries and government.
The UK "free school" approach has been a mixed bag. On the one hand, various academy chains have managed to turn around failing schools. On the other, some parents are left with no choice but to send their child to a religious school due to catchment areas and waiting lists.
As a tax payer, I don't want my contributions going towards religious institutions.
The loss of "special schools" for students with severe special needs has not helped anyone (imo).
- gadders 3y agoA lot of religious non-selective schools tend to get better results than non-selective secular schools. You see a few parents suddenly get religion as their child turns 9 or 10 and they realise they are unlikely to get into a grammar school.