5 ms·
Ah, now I understand. You're saying that it's fallacious to believe that an upswing will necessarily have a downswing, and vice versa, is that correct? What I
by mmj48 14y ago
Ah, now I understand. You're saying that it's fallacious to believe that an upswing will necessarily have a downswing, and vice versa, is that correct?
What I understood (due to hastily coming to conclusions) was it is dangerous to believe that life has lows and highs.
- tripzilch 14y agoThat's right, but it's also important to realize that, in fact, there is no grand narrative[1]. Humans are compulsive pattern-recognizers and can turn any arbitrary independent sequence of events into a story. That doesn't mean the story is wrong, per se, but it does mean you cannot presume to know where a story "is leading up to". Because the only "complete" story is the one that is told afterwards. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_narrative http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_narrative (lots of "blah" btw)
- mmj48 14y agoAh, yes, thank you for the explanation.