5 ms·
Cute & fun, but not engineered very well. In order to have the sunken bed: - he's raised the floor (effectively lowering the ceiling) - cut his floor spac
by fabricode 14y ago
Cute & fun, but not engineered very well. In order to have the sunken bed:
- he's raised the floor (effectively lowering the ceiling)
- cut his floor space dramatically
- made the center of the room unusable (stairs)
- introduced a dependency between electricity & sleep
(though there's probably a manual override)
- made it harder to change his sheets
- annoyed the neighbors (power drill to open the bed)
- made moving day a royal PITA
I think a bunk bed w/o a lower bed would be a better, cheaper, and less problematic solution.
- citricsquid 14y agoYes, the electrical component is unnecessary. He could have quite simply built a raised floor (as he has done, maybe 1ft off the ground) cut a hole in the middle, stuck in a mattress and then during the day had a board that covers the top to create a complete "floor". Definitely cute and fun, but impractical and over-engineered.
- stephengillie 14y agoHow would you feel about sleeping on a sunken bed, which would be under a removable section of floor during the day?