6 ms·
For me, Ubuntu on a VPS is always a viable alternative to the PaaS offerings. Canonical's distribution makes it easy to get up and running quickly.
by va_coder 14y ago
For me, Ubuntu on a VPS is always a viable alternative to the PaaS offerings. Canonical's distribution makes it easy to get up and running quickly.
- nakkiel 14y agoWhat is Canonical bringing on the VPS that is so specific? I haven't yet seen anything really interesting coming from Canonical. They have a debian base with more recent packages but they also break more often (although quality has improved on Ubuntu in the last couple of years). Sure these are good systems. My experience on Ubuntu has been roughly equivalent to my experience on ArchLinux. What Canonical brings is more clicka as we call them. GUIs certainly are appealing for a certain category of users that also happen to be casual system administrators. Also, I suppose you are slightly missing the goodness of PaaS. The only interesting thing in PaaS is instant deployment (as in single-step). A VPS with a custom image and a couple of scripts hardly ever gets as easy as PaaS unless you are small and thus have very few different configurations (which is a good thing).
- va_coder 14y ago>>What is Canonical bringing on the VPS that is so specific? Little things, like UFW for easy firewall setup. But you're right Debian is often doing the heavy lifting.