5 ms·
Meh I dunno, there's that website that reports how many hiroshimas of energy we're releasing into our planet per second, the skeptics/denialists don't seem to c
by gameoverhumans 3y ago
Meh I dunno, there's that website that reports how many hiroshimas of energy we're releasing into our planet per second, the skeptics/denialists don't seem to care much for that metric, either.
I don't think the problem is how it's being reported, I think it's just that this is the kind of news some people will do anything but hear.
- MattPalmer1086 3y agoI hadn't heard of the Hiroshima's per second before. That sounds like the kind of metric that might change a few minds. Denialists won't listen to anything anyway, but I think there's probably a lot of people who hear 1 or 2 degrees (globally) and just think meh, doesn't sound so bad.
- gameoverhumans 3y agoI went looking for the website I was thinking of, but instead I found this article from The Conversation: https://theconversation.com/four-hiroshima-bombs-a-second-how-we-imagine-climate-change-16387 https://theconversation.com/four-hiroshima-bombs-a-second-ho... Dated 2013. 10 years ago we were already talking about how we're releasing 4 Hiroshimas into the atmosphere per second. Good thing that woke everyone up and enacted a decisive response to the existential thr---- oh.
- MattPalmer1086 3y agoWell, I think that's the point of that article. It says that we need to communicate in terms people can relate to better (than just some average temperature over the whole planet). So no, we weren't talking like that 10 years ago, but we had identified that we needed better messaging. But we did nothing about that.