It isn't misinformation. Here is a study that basically rebuts every implication of the study you linked: https://twitter.com/VirusesImmunity/status/17063329657

It isn't misinformation. Here is a study that basically rebuts every implication of the study you linked: https://twitter.com/VirusesImmunity/status/1706332965792272722?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1706332965792272722%7Ctwgr%5Eb20d95af30aaf47198d512bdd5cee0fbd25e6820%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FCoronavirus%2Fcomments%2F16svf05%2Fhow_methodological_pitfalls_have_created%2F https://twitter.com/VirusesImmunity/status/17063329657922727... Another link questioning the process behind the entire study itself: https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-an-analysis-of-the-body-of-research-on-long-covid-suggesting-potential-methodological-flaws/ https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-an-ana...